Part 2 in our Glyphosate Series
Remember when we talked about glyphosate getting the green light for another ten years despite all the red flags? That article dug into regulatory loopholes, questionable studies, and the quiet reapproval of the world’s most controversial herbicide.
Well, buckle up—because Bayer (the company behind Roundup) isn’t just riding the wave of regulatory approval. It’s now trying to rewrite the legal playbook altogether.
Featured Video: Understanding the Roundup Lawsuit: What You Need to Know
Before we dive into the details, take a few minutes to watch this short video. It provides a clear overview of the Roundup lawsuits, the health concerns surrounding glyphosate, and why Bayer is facing such intense legal pressure.
🎥 Understanding the Roundup Lawsuit: What You Need to Know YouTube
Now that you’ve watched the video, you have a better sense of what’s at stake—not just for Bayer, but for all of us.
It sets the foundation for what this article explores next: how Bayer is trying to rewrite the rules and protect its bottom line at the expense of transparency, justice, and public health.
177,000 Lawsuits and Counting
Since acquiring Monsanto in 2018, Bayer has been drowning in lawsuits—177,000 of them—alleging that Roundup causes cancer, particularly non-Hodgkin lymphoma. And while the company has paid out over $10 billion in settlements, that hasn’t stopped the legal floodgates from opening.
Instead of seriously addressing public health concerns or pausing to consider what 177,000 cases might actually mean, Bayer is doing what many powerful corporations do when the heat turns up:
They’re trying to change the rules.
The “EPA Label Defense” Loophole
Here’s the strategy Bayer is pushing:
If a product complies with EPA-approved labeling, no one should be able to sue them—even if that product causes harm.
Yes, really.
Bayer wants to create a legal shield. As long as Roundup’s label ticks all the EPA boxes, the company could be protected from future lawsuits—regardless of what the science or the victims say.
And they’re not just whispering about it. Bayer is actively lobbying for federal legislation that would make this happen.
Why This Should Worry You
The EPA isn’t infallible. In fact, while the agency says glyphosate is “unlikely to cause cancer in humans,” the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans” back in 2015.
A 2019 meta-analysis found that people with high exposure to glyphosate had a 41% increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
And the CDC detected glyphosate in over 80% of urine samples collected across the U.S.—including from children.
So yeah, there’s a reason the lawsuits keep coming.
Now imagine a world where those lawsuits are no longer possible—not because the product is safe, but because it complies with a regulatory checklist.
That’s not safety. That’s a strategy.
Justice on Trial
If Bayer succeeds, it sets a dangerous precedent. It tells every corporation:
As long as you follow the checklist, you’re off the hook.
This isn’t about proving glyphosate is safe—it’s about eliminating the legal risk of ever having to prove it’s not.
It’s the quiet erosion of your right to justice, wrapped in bureaucratic language and shielded by a federal agency.
What You Can Do
We can’t control corporate lobbying. But we can choose how we respond:
- Buy organic when possible—or from farmers using regenerative practices that prioritize soil health and chemical-free growing.
- Use tools like the EWG’s Dirty Dozen list to reduce pesticide exposure.
- Support advocacy organizations fighting for legal accountability and food transparency.
- Talk about it. Share this. Start conversations. Stay awake.
Every action counts. And together, they make a difference.
Final Thought: Whose Side Is the System On?
This isn’t just about Roundup anymore. It’s about a system where corporations get to rewrite the rules—while the rest of us live with the consequences.
If we let this slide, we lose more than the ability to sue.
We lose our say in what’s considered safe, just, and acceptable.
And that’s a Critical MindShift worth making.
Further reading:
To deepen your understanding of the ongoing controversies surrounding Bayer’s Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate, I’ve compiled a selection of insightful resources. These articles, books, and videos offer diverse perspectives on the legal battles, health implications, and corporate maneuvers associated with this widely used herbicide.
Articles:
Bayer lobbies Congress to help fight lawsuits tying Roundup to cancer
This Washington Post article delves into Bayer’s legislative efforts to secure protections against lawsuits alleging that Roundup causes cancer, highlighting the company’s influence on policymaking.
Bayer backs broadened effort to shield popular weedkiller from claims it failed to warn of cancer
The Associated Press examines Bayer’s intensified push for legislation that would limit liability claims related to Roundup, amidst ongoing legal challenges and public scrutiny.
Toxic Effects of Glyphosate on the Nervous System
Published in PubMed Central, this research article explores the neurotoxic potential of glyphosate, discussing its impact on neurotransmission, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation.
Childhood exposure to common herbicide may increase the risk of disease in young adulthood
This study from the UC Berkeley School of Public Health links childhood exposure to glyphosate with liver inflammation and metabolic disorders in early adulthood, suggesting long-term health risks.
Books:
The following books are linked to Amazon.com for your convenience. If you decide to purchase through these links, we may earn a small commission — at no extra cost to you.
Toxic Legacy: How the Weedkiller Glyphosate Is Destroying Our Health and the Environment [amazon.com]
By Stephanie Seneff
MIT scientist Stephanie Seneff presents compelling evidence on the detrimental effects of glyphosate on human health and the environment, urging readers to reconsider its widespread use.
Whitewash: The Story of a Weed Killer, Cancer, and the Corruption of Science [amazon.com]
By Carey Gillam
Investigative journalist Carey Gillam uncovers the corporate influence and scientific manipulation surrounding glyphosate, drawing parallels to historical environmental scandals.
The Monsanto Papers: Deadly Secrets, Corporate Corruption, and One Man’s Search for Justice
By Carey Gillam
This book provides an inside look at the landmark lawsuit against Monsanto, revealing the company’s efforts to conceal the dangers of Roundup and the quest for justice by affected individuals.
Videos:
Understanding the Roundup Lawsuit: What You Need to Know
This YouTube video offers a comprehensive overview of the legal battles surrounding Roundup, detailing the allegations, court proceedings, and implications for consumers.
Roundup Litigation and Glyphosate Bayer United States
In this video, experts discuss the complexities of the Roundup litigation, examining the scientific debates over glyphosate’s safety and the broader impact on public health policies.
Why Did It Take So Long To Sue Bayer/Monsanto? Mark Hyman, MD
Featuring an interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., this video explores the challenges and delays in holding Bayer/Monsanto accountable for the alleged health risks associated with Roundup.
These resources provide a multifaceted exploration of the controversies surrounding Roundup, offering valuable insights into the legal, scientific, and corporate dimensions of this ongoing debate.
Image acknowledgement
The featured image on this page is by madvideos.gmail.com. Check out their work on Depositphotos.com.
